The greatest concern initially, was
the unsure unfamiliar feeling of discussing the book in such a small group as opposed
to the open class. Chances to talk felt limited as each member of the group
seemed unsure as when to speak. Reading was done at a very fast pace, and I did
not give enough time to myself to read the chapters thoroughly. After the first
discussion, greater attention needed to be paid to allowing each member to
discuss their opinions. Personally, I was nervous and felt as if being more
comfortable and familiar with the chapters read would improve this discomfort.
Notes should have been written as the book was being read. Overall, the second
discussion went smoothly. The group did not feel as tightly guarded, nor did
they want interrupt throughout the event. The notes taken before hand, help
significantly with memory, and greatly aided in my personal contribution to the
group discussion.
Sunday, December 8, 2013
Thursday, October 31, 2013
In the novel, Lord of the Flies by William Golding, the conch shell symbolizes leadership and civilization. Throughout the novel the boys have used the conch to gather everyone together for meetings. If you hold the conch, then you have the right to speak. When Ralph first finds the shell he says, “That’s what the shell is called. I’ll give the conch to the next person to speak. He can hold it when he is speaking”(33). This quote demonstrates civilization as the boys take turns speaking with the conch. The boys begin to learn organization traits that help them come together as a unit.The conch also represents leadership; when Ralph blows the conch all of the boys gather for a meeting around him. When they first find the conch Piggy says ” We can use this to call the others . Have a meeting. They will come when they hear us”(16). Ever Since he first time the found the conch it has been a symbol for leadership and civilization because when he blew the conch, the boys went to Ralph.
Towards the end of the book the conch was destroyed; therefore, the boys had no object for civilization and leadership. At this point of the book the boys began to have chaos because there was no symbol of leadership.Thursday, October 24, 2013
John Green’s “Looking for Alaska:”
Will the Search Ever End
Reviewed by Josh Hanna
The complex journey of a young adult growing up after hopelessly falling for the love of his life is what “Looking for Alaska” leads us through. Innocence is lost, as responsibility and hardship with our own emotion comes to light in this romantic drama in one boy’s coming of age.

Also, what I thought was most interesting was the poetic language of the book. “So I walked back to my room and collapsed on the bottom bunk, thinking that if people were rain, I was drizzle and she was a hurricane.” (88); similes “like a North Carolina tobacco field in a wildfire” (56) exemplify the beautiful language of John Green. Both not only captured the thoughts and emotion I valued so much in the book, but they were worded in a way which I felt was intelligent and lyrical even. Additionally, there was the pre accident and post accident structure of the book, which constantly kept me reading on to fill in the blanks. I felt this was an elegant way to structure the story, and broke it off from just another boring book.
While the novel is linguistically beautiful and the story was far from the typical cheesy romance novels, I still found certain parts of it to be a bit too much for me. With all of John Green’s powerful ways with words, and the story told, sometimes, ideas presented in the story was simply too abstract, and I felt like I was missing something. Finally, I found myself frustrated at certain times in the book from the characters being a bit too melodramatic about the mundane.
Overall, I found this book to be a great read and spoke to me in many different ways. I enjoyed following the life of Miles and truly heard his love and pain in the story. It was a great story of growing up and never losing hope no matter the situation, and that sometimes us being imperfect is okay.
Tuesday, October 15, 2013
Malcolm Gladwell
Today, society preaches to condemn bias and judgment, yet in Gladwell's paper, he proves that everybody has a subconscious bias. What was most interesting in this chapter, was how Gladwell was able to prove his point of unconscious bias by performing simple test throughout his essay. With simple name recognition, he was able to prove how gender has been taught to us with the fast paced test provoking the taker to have to thing as stereotypes become less vague and seemingly contradicting. I personally feel that I am apart of this bias, but these actions are not what they should be. Gladwell hopes to help realize this so that we can be aware and choose leaders appropriately and not solely based on appearance.
Leader's ideally reflect what the majority of the people want to resemble their ideals. Beyond ideals, they hold the weight of what others by themselves cannot. I feel that personal appearance is strongly correlated to our choice of leader. People was a whole tend to lean toward leaders who hold a physical appearance of what is the social ideal of popular. Gladwell tied the election of Harding into senate to his strong 'roman' physical characteristic, which made people feel like he was a leader. However, instead of choosing leaders by their appearance, people should be more aware of their subconscious bias, and choose leaders for their attitudes, ideals, acceptance to criticism, and willingness to help others.
The IAT test proved that I was indeed bias much like Gladwell proved in his essay. The race test attempted to show that one was either biased towards whites or blacks. I feel that this test accurately proved his point. While it is the social stigma not to judge a book by its cover, Gladwell and the IAT test proved that subconsciously, I did have a personal bias.
Leader's ideally reflect what the majority of the people want to resemble their ideals. Beyond ideals, they hold the weight of what others by themselves cannot. I feel that personal appearance is strongly correlated to our choice of leader. People was a whole tend to lean toward leaders who hold a physical appearance of what is the social ideal of popular. Gladwell tied the election of Harding into senate to his strong 'roman' physical characteristic, which made people feel like he was a leader. However, instead of choosing leaders by their appearance, people should be more aware of their subconscious bias, and choose leaders for their attitudes, ideals, acceptance to criticism, and willingness to help others.
The IAT test proved that I was indeed bias much like Gladwell proved in his essay. The race test attempted to show that one was either biased towards whites or blacks. I feel that this test accurately proved his point. While it is the social stigma not to judge a book by its cover, Gladwell and the IAT test proved that subconsciously, I did have a personal bias.
Sunday, September 29, 2013
Tuesday write Reality tv shows
Reality tv shows are very harmful to the modern day society. Reality tv shows are not beneficial because what happens in the shows doesnt always happen in peoples everyday lives.
In keeping up with the Kardashians they get to shop whenever they want and they can go anywhere in the country at any moment. This is not an example of what happens in peoples everyday lives. People that watch keeping up with the Kardashians can get unrealistic expectations about their lives. In addition Jersey shore expresses fake reality because you dont get to party every night. People that watch Jersey Shore may be influenced on the wrong ways of life. Reality tv shows do no good to people that watch them because they give a distorted and unrealistic look upon life.
Some people may believe that reality tv shows can be beneficial to peoples everyday lives! The Biggest Loser is helpful to people that need motivation, and need to lose weight! The TV show may be that extra boost some people need to get up and change the way the look and live after the experiencing the show. Additionally 16 and Pregnant can send a positive message to its viewers. The show folows the lives of people who have made the mistake getting pregnant at a young age. It show the consequences to the viewers of the harsh reality that a decision such as childbirth can bring.
However, contrary to the positives these two shows bring, the reality is that the viewer watching these shows are not learning, but are judging. These shows show personal struggles all for the entertainment of the general audience in addition to ratings which fund the network. I do not believe this is an ethical way to extort entertainment.
Some reality tv shows can be beneficial but the majority of them are harmful to the people that watch them. While shows can show misfortune of others and possibly even teach us lessons, we only see what we want. We see the lives we can not have and want to be as wild as they are. Finally, I do not believe that someone's personal struggles should be used for profit, especially when displayed to the public.
In keeping up with the Kardashians they get to shop whenever they want and they can go anywhere in the country at any moment. This is not an example of what happens in peoples everyday lives. People that watch keeping up with the Kardashians can get unrealistic expectations about their lives. In addition Jersey shore expresses fake reality because you dont get to party every night. People that watch Jersey Shore may be influenced on the wrong ways of life. Reality tv shows do no good to people that watch them because they give a distorted and unrealistic look upon life.
Some people may believe that reality tv shows can be beneficial to peoples everyday lives! The Biggest Loser is helpful to people that need motivation, and need to lose weight! The TV show may be that extra boost some people need to get up and change the way the look and live after the experiencing the show. Additionally 16 and Pregnant can send a positive message to its viewers. The show folows the lives of people who have made the mistake getting pregnant at a young age. It show the consequences to the viewers of the harsh reality that a decision such as childbirth can bring.
However, contrary to the positives these two shows bring, the reality is that the viewer watching these shows are not learning, but are judging. These shows show personal struggles all for the entertainment of the general audience in addition to ratings which fund the network. I do not believe this is an ethical way to extort entertainment.
Some reality tv shows can be beneficial but the majority of them are harmful to the people that watch them. While shows can show misfortune of others and possibly even teach us lessons, we only see what we want. We see the lives we can not have and want to be as wild as they are. Finally, I do not believe that someone's personal struggles should be used for profit, especially when displayed to the public.
Monday, September 9, 2013
Intro
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)